UltraSIPS University

Lesson 10: Common Objections to SIP Designs

How to respond to cost, lead time, and performance concerns.

Lesson: 10Duration: 50 min
Lesson 10: Common Objections to SIP Designs
Personalize this lesson

Choose your viewer type

Set your role once and we will tailor the guidance across SIP University.

Set your role

Turning objections into decisions

Most objections are really about uncertainty. When you answer with outcomes and data - programme certainty, energy performance, and clear approval routes - the conversation shifts from fear to planning. UltraSIPS supports this with comparisons, references, and simple next steps.

Clear answers reduce hesitation and keep decisions moving.

The mindset that works

Objections are not attacks. They are signals about confidence. A calm response builds trust and helps the client move forward.

Comparison

Objection response style

The tone matters as much as the facts.

Defensive

  • Short answers
  • Dismisses concerns
  • Creates distance

Calm and evidence-based

  • Explains trade-offs
  • Shows proof and examples
  • Invites the next step

Objection: SIPs cost more

Response: Compare total project cost, not just panels. Faster enclosure reduces labour, weather risk, and site overheads.

Hero

Objection: Lead times are too long

Response: Lead time is predictable. Use it to plan foundations and services. Delays are often worse with traditional supply chains.

Objection: Durability concerns

Response: SIP durability depends on detailing and water management. Proper flashing, edge protection, and ventilation keep panels stable for decades.

Objection: Fire performance is unclear

Response: Fire performance depends on skins, linings, and detailing. Provide certified assemblies and compliance notes.

House split

Objection: Pest risk

Response: In the UK the more relevant concern is rodents and wood-boring insects (woodworm) if panels are left exposed. Good cavity detailing, sealed edges, and airtightness keep pests out.

Objection: Acoustic performance (noisy)

Response: SIPs can meet strong acoustic targets when combined with correct linings, resilient layers, and junction details.

Objection: Hard to modify

Response: Modifications are possible but require planning. Pre-planned openings and service routes prevent compromises.

Objection: Limits design capability

Response: SIPs reward simple geometry, but they can still support complex shapes with early coordination. The key is to design with the panel grid in mind.

Objection: Untrained workforce

Response: SIPs install quickly when crews follow a proven sequence. Short training and clear layout drawings remove most risk.

Objection: Code approval

Response: UK building control and warranty providers already accept SIPs. Provide evidence of approvals and tested assemblies.

Objection: Electrical and services

Response: Service zones and chases keep the structure intact. Plan routes early and seal every penetration.

Objection: Mould and moisture

Response: Moisture issues come from leaks and poor ventilation, not SIPs themselves. With airtight joints and planned ventilation, SIPs stay dry.

Objection response checklist

  • Ask for the real concern behind the question.
  • Use data and a short example.
  • Offer a next step (detail, call, or sample).
Knowledge CheckQuestion 1 of 10

What is the best first step when a client raises an objection?

What to do next

Choose your viewer type to see tailored next steps.

Set your role
Was this useful?

Ready to build your own kit specific to your project?

Explore SIP kit options and choose the build type that fits your brief.

View kit options

Finished this lesson?

Mark it as complete to track your progress towards becoming a SIP expert.